|
CODE OF ETHICS OF THE UNITED STATES CHESS FEDERATION
(Revised Sept. 2004)
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
1. The purpose of this code of ethics is to set forth standards to which
the conduct of players, tournament directors, sponsors, and other
individuals and entities participating in the affairs of the United
States Chess Federation (USCF), including tournaments and other
activities sponsored by or sanctioned by the USCF, should conform; to
specify sanctions for conduct that does not conform to such standards;
and to specify the procedures by which alleged violations are to be
investigated and, if necessary, the appropriate sanctions imposed.
2. The standards, procedures, and sanctions set forth in this code of
ethics are not equivalent to criminal laws and procedures. Rather, they
concern the rights and privileges of USCF membership, including, but not
limited to, the privilege of participating in tournaments, events, or
other activities as a member of the USCF.
3. The standards, procedures, and sanctions set forth in this code of
ethics shall apply only to actions and behavior by:
(A) members of the USCF, that occur in connection with tournaments or other activities sponsored by or sanctioned by the USCF; and (B) individuals and entities acting in an official capacity as officers or representatives of the USCF. This code shall not apply to actions or behavior by employees of
USCF acting in the scope of their duties. Such actions fall instead under
the province of the Executive Board.
4. Each member of the USCF and each participant in a USCF activity shall be bound by this code of ethics.
THE USCF ETHICS COMMITTEE
5. The USCF Ethics Committee is appointed in accordance with procedures
consistent with the bylaws of the USCF. The committee exists to consider
allegations of unethical conduct at or in connection with events
sanctioned by the USCF, and allegations of unethical conduct involving
the USCF and its activities, in accordance with the standards and
procedures contained in this code. The committee will exercise all other
duties as may be assigned by the Bylaws or by action of the USCF Board
of Delegates.
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
6. The actions and behavior of individuals participating in USCF
activities, or in events sponsored by or sanctioned by the USCF, shall
be lawful and in accordance with all USCF rules and regulations, and
consistent with the principles of fair play, good sportsmanship,
honesty, and respect for the rights of others. The following is a list
of examples of actions and behavior that are considered unethical. The
list is not intended to be exhaustive, and any action or behavior that
is unlawful or violates USCF rules and regulations, or is inconsistent
with the principles of fair play, good sportsmanship, honesty, and
respect for the rights of others, may be considered to fall within the
scope of this code of ethics.
(a) Intentional violations of tournament regulations, or of any other
regulations pertaining to USCF activities and goals, particularly after
being warned.
(b) Cheating in a game of chess by illegally giving, receiving,
offering, or soliciting advice; or by consulting written sources; or by
tampering with clocks; or in any other manner.
(c) Deliberately losing a game for payment, or to lower one's rating, or
for any other reason; or attempting to induce another player to do
so. Deliberately failing to play at one's best in a game, in any manner
inconsistent with the principles of good sportsmanship, honesty, or fair
play.
(d) Deliberately misrepresenting one's playing ability in order to
compete in a tournament or division of a tournament intended for players
of lesser ability; players with foreign ratings are expected to disclose
those ratings.
(e) Participating in a tournament under a false name or submitting a
falsified rating report..
(f) Participating in a tournament while under suspension.
(g) Purposely giving false information in order to circumvent or violate
any rule or regulation or goal recognized by the USCF.
(h) Attempting to interfere with the rights of any USCF member, such as
by barring someone from entering a USCF-sanctioned event for personal
reasons. Generally, no individual should be barred from a
USCF-sanctioned event for which he or she meets the advertised
qualifications, without appropriate due process, and then only for behavior
inconsistent with the principles of this code and/or the rules of
chess. If a ban on future participation is imposed , the individual
should be notified of the ban prior to his attempting to appear at
future events.
(i) Violating federal, state, or local laws while participating in
activities that are associated with the USCF.
PROCEDURES
7. Any USCF member may initiate procedures under this code of ethics by
filing a complaint in a timely manner with the USCF Ethics Committee. A good-faith deposit of
$25 must be submitted by the complainant. The deposit shall be returned unless the
Committee rules that the case is frivolous. The Committee may determine whether to
return the deposit even before it determines jurisdictional and merit questions.
The Committee may also, by a two-thirds vote, accept complaints submitted without
the $25 deposit. In the case of any accusation that does not fall clearly under the
"Standards of Conduct" above, the Ethics Committee shall have the authority to
decide whether the alleged conduct is within the scope of the code of ethics.
In the case of each alleged violation that is within the scope of the code of ethics,
the following steps shall occur in a timely manner:
(a) A factual inquiry shall be made by the Ethics Committee, assisted as
necessary by the USCF staff. Previous findings of the Ethics Committee
or other USCF entities may be included among the evidence considered by
the Ethics Committee, if relevant to the circumstances of the present
case. As a part of such an inquiry, any person accused of unethical
conduct shall have the right to examine the evidence against him or her,
the right to respond to the accusation, and the right to produce written
evidence in his or her behalf.
(b) Appropriate sanctions, if any, shall be recommended to the
Executive Board by the Ethics Committee. In recommending sanctions, the Ethics
Committee may consider any previous ruling or finding of the Ethics Committee,
or other USCF entity, pertaining to the past conduct of the person being sanctioned.
In recommending sanctions, the person being recommended for sanctions must be informed
of this fact. Any person against whom sanctions have been recommended shall be promptly
notified.
(c) Except as specified in 7(e) sanctions recommended
to the Executive Board shall be deemed final unless appealed to the Executive
Board by the person or persons upon whom the sanctions have been imposed, or
upon the initiative of any member of the Executive Board. Such an appeal must
be made within thirty days of the date that notification of recommended sanctions
occurred, except that the Executive Board may extend the deadline for appeal if in
its judgment an unavoidable delay in communications or other valid cause prevented
a timely appeal. If an appeal has not been filed by the deadline the recommended
sanctions shall be placed into effect.
(d) Upon appeal, a review of the facts and the appropriateness of the
recommended sanction shall be undertaken by the Executive Board. The person against whom the sanction has been recommended, as well as the person filing the initial complaint, shall be given notice of the time and
place the Executive Board will review the case. The person against whom the sanctions have been recommended shall have the right to appear before
the Board and present evidence. In all appeals the recommended sanctions
imposed by the Ethics Committee shall not be in effect until the appeal
hearing is completed. The recommended sanctions shall be either
confirmed, modified, or revoked by the Executive Board.
(e) If the person against whom sanctions have been recommended is a
member of the USCF Executive Board, he or she may not appeal the sanctions to the Executive
Board, but may appeal to the USCF Board of Delegates at its next scheduled meeting.
(f) If any member of the Ethics Committee or of the USCF Executive Board
has a conflict of interest of any kind that might preclude objective
participation in the consideration of any case, that person may not act
in the capacity of a committee or board member on the case.
SANCTIONS:
8. The following are some of the sanctions that may be imposed as a
result of the procedures specified above. In unusual cases, other
appropriate sanctions may be imposed, or these sanctions may be varied
or combined.
(a) Reprimand. A determination that a member has committed an offense
warranting discipline becomes a matter of record, but no further
sanction is imposed at the time. A reprimand automatically carries a
probation of at least three months, or longer if so specified. If the
member is judged guilty of another offense during the probation, he or
she is then liable to further sanctions for both offenses.
(b) Censure. A determination that a member has committed a
serious offense warranting discipline becomes a matter of record, but no
further sanction is imposed at the time. Censure automatically carries a
probation of at least one year, or longer if so specified. If the member
is judged guilty of another offense during the probationary period, he
or she is then liable to further sanctions for both offenses.
(c) Suspended sentence with probation. A determination is made that the
member has committed an offense warranting discipline. When the
discipline is imposed and execution thereof suspended, such suspension
shall include probation for at least six months longer than the
discipline imposed. If the member is judged guilty of another offense
during this period, unless otherwise decreed, the original discipline
shall be added to such new discipline as may be imposed for the new
offense.
(d) Suspension. Suspension is a determination that the member has
committed an offense warranting abrogation, for a specified period of
time, of all membership rights and privileges.
(e) Expulsion. Expulsion is a determination that a member has committed
an offense warranting permanent abrogation of all membership rights and
privileges. An expelled member may be readmitted to membership only by
the USCF Executive Board or by the USCF Board of Delegates.
(f) Exclusion from events. This is a more selective determination that a
member has committed an offense warranting abrogation of the right to
participate in certain specified events or activities.
9. If the person being sanctioned is a member of the USCF Executive Board,
the Ethics Committee may recommend to the Executive Board no sanctions other than
censure or reprimand, but may also recommend to the Board of Delegates other actions.
10. In the case of every sanction that involves suspension or expulsion,
a member may not hold any office in the USCF or participate in any
capacity in any event or activity sponsored by or sanctioned by the
USCF.
11. The USCF Business Office shall be informed in writing of all
official determinations by the Ethics Committee, and shall record any
recommendations of any sanctions. The USCF Business Office shall inform
the Executive Board of any sanctions recommended.
|